AN IMPLODING SYRIA: IMPLICATIONS
‘In a guerrilla war the rebels only have
not to lose to win; however, unless a regular army is clearly winning, it will
lose.’-- Henry Kissinger
(Former US Secretary of State).
When
Syria caught up with the warmth of the Arab spring in March 2011, all thought
it would be a matter of days/weeks as seen in Tunisia then calm will return
back to the streets of Dimashq.
Instead,
the Syrian scenario has defied all prescriptions of top UN diplomats in Kofi Annan who after several
unsuccessful mediations had to resign. Then came Lakhdar Brahimi as the new UN
envoy to Syria; but he had to admit the tough task ahead of him when he clearly
spelt out that the Syrian crises was turning to a civil conflict.
Indeed,
what started as a solidarity Arab spring protest in Deraa ended up being fatal
on the 22nd of April 2011, when 72 protesters were killed by security
forces firing on protesters.
Since then, mass killings have been a common show piece in all concerning
Syria. From Jisr al-Shughour, Jabal al-Zawiya, Homs, Aleppo, Houla, Darayya to
Baniyas et al; it’s been a common story of fatalities with the Syrian
Government trading the blame on ‘armed gangs’ (Syrian rebel groups) as being
responsible.
Whilst
reports from Syria are most times independently unverifiable, it’s common consensus
that the Syrian crises has reached a destructive peak as seen in the streams of
refugees pouring into refugee camps in Jordan and Turkey. Estimated figures put
the Syrian war causalities at 70,000 dead and over a million refugees. With the
parties to the conflict bickering unendingly, casualty and fatality figures
will continue to soar at an already seeming detriment to the future of Syria
and the ever volatile Middle East.
Most
intriguing and despicable to the unending conflict are the several unseemly proxy actions of
world and regional powers who for reasons best known to their foreign policy
interest have helped continue the Syrian conflict in full blast. What started
as a heavy government response to protesters, led to army defections, suicide
blasts, foreign linked fighters and recently and Al-Queda connection all of
which does have a devastating imploding effect on Syria.
Whilst
the Syrian conflict itself has been self destroying, the question of arming
rebel groups is a conscience quiz in the hearts of the war weary western
powers. With the ripples of Afghanistan and Iraq still fresh, there’s definitely
not going to be any ‘western boot on the ground’. Arming the rebels is another
teaser! And the question is who are they? On one hand is the Syrian National
Coalition (SNC) who most powers (regional and western) have recognized as the
legitimate Syrian government and on the other hand is the Free Syrian Army (a
loose network of armed men fighting against the government). The shocker to the
Syrian opposition is the incoherence of the opposition on both the political
and military fronts. In fact, one may borrow the descriptive parlance of the
Syrian government which refers to them as ‘Armed gangs’- A loose network of
renegade soldiers, ‘men with guns’, foreign fighters and jihadists as
represented by the Al-Nusra front who have only recently announced their
cohesion into the main Al-Queda body. It’s obvious that though the opposition
(political and military) are united against the Assad regime, the same cannot
be said of their ideologies!
Israeli Jets setting off to hit
Syrian targets
Source: BBC news
|
Hezbollah
draws a multidimensional issue to the conflict. Already, it’s no more news that
its fighters are actively engaged in the Syrian conflict providing much needed
man power for Assad’s forces. That role in itself is another complex whole!
Hezbollah is a Lebanon based Shiite militia wholly funded by Syria and Iran to
provide much needed home aggression to the Zionist enemy-Israel. With its
fighters actively engaged in the Syria and Israeli planes taking to the skies
to hunt targets, it might just be a matter of time before Israel is dragged to
a full scale war with whom? Maybe Hezbollah, but the battle ground would
definitely be wider this time around. It will strew from southern Lebanon to
Syria and with a Shiite led government already in place in an unstable Iraq, it
might just provide the needed base for a regional conflict between Israel and
‘Greater Hezbollah’ (Lebanon, Syria, Iraq and Iran). An already brewing sectarian
conflict between the dominant minority Alawite offshoot of Shia Islam and the
majority Sunnis cannot be brushed aside too.
A conflict laden Syria amid her conflict sensitive
neighbours
Source: BBC news
|
The
indecision of western powers in arming the opposition must be given some
thoughts; or how else will the Syrian scenario look with Assad out of power and
lots of arms in the street with no decisive central government? The Iraqi
situation answers the question.
On
a critical note is the humanitarian dimension of the Syrian conflict. Whilst it
has in itself been self destroying in terms of social and cultural
infrastructure, Syrian males continue to provide the man power for the
fighting, and Syrian females due to worsening economic situation caused by the
conflict, are into haphazard marriage contracts where rich Arab males pay heavy bride
prices for Syrian ladies in order to provide much needed funds for survival of the
already dismembered Syrian families. Sadly such females end up in unhappy/
slave marriages.
It’s
sad to write about the unfolding Syrian quagmire. One only hopes that the talk
between the US and Russian foreign secretaries yield positive actions, else the
third world war alert will shift from the activities in the Korean peninsula to
the Middle East!
No comments:
Post a Comment