In one of his Satires, 1st Century Roman Poet, Decimus Iunius Iuvenalis
also referred to as Juvenal asked in a rhetorical manner... ‘quis custodiet ipsos custodes?’ translating
in English to mean ‘who guards the guards?’ Amid the security challanges facing
the nation, a question that readily comes to mind is ‘who guards the guards?’ In our contemporary world where
crime has reached extreme sophistication, it requires extreme sophisticated
policing to tackle.
Like every nation,
Nigeria is bedeviled with numerous criminal activities ranging from armed
robbery, fraud, insurgency, ritual killings among numerous others. Although it
is the desire of every peace loving citizen to have a sane society, crime like
cancer is ever present and can be either benignant
or malignant; thus, making it is the onus task of a country’s security apparatus to curb or quell
crime. Nigeria, like any other country in the world has a security apparatus
postioned against internal and external intrusion.
Ever since
independence, Nigeria has been plagued by ethnic conflicts, civil war,
religious riots, electoral violence, armed robbery and of recent, Boko Haram
insurgency.
In recent times, the intensity of these conflicts has caused the government to
deploy special military apparatus commonly known with different acronyms such
as JTF (Joint Task Force) in the Niger Delta, ORO (Operation Restore Order) in
the North East, STF (Special Task Force) around Jos and trouble spots around the
country.
In Nigeria, violent crimes most times follow a common trend;
firstly an aggrieved hatred against a targeted group of people and then targeted
or sporadic killings with the security apparatus watching helplessly. Action
from the government most times only comes after several lives have been lost. Of
recent, the following security issues have once more raised the question ‘who guards the guards?’, viz;
*
The bombing
incident at the Eagles Square amid the Jubilee anniversary celebration of
Nigeria’s Independence. Independence celebrations have been confined to the
Presidential villa since then
*
The attack on the Police
Anti-Robbery Squad Headquarters in November 2012
*
The suicide
bombing attack at the Nigeria Police Force Headquarters at Abuja in June
2011
*
The Suicide bombing attack at the Nigeria
Police Force Zone 1 headquarters at Kano in January 2012
Among several incidents these stand out and call for
the question ‘quis custodiet ipsos
custodes?’ …. Who guards the guards?
The Sucide attack on the Nigeria Police Force Headquarters on 16th June 2011; an apparent attempt on the life of the Inspector General of police....quis custodiet ipsos custodes? |
Around the country, the sight of armed soldiers manning
roadblocks alongside policemen is a common scene. Whilst this give an
additional security assurance to the common man, it must be noted that Soldiers
are not meant to man road roadblocks; the sight of gun totting soldiers reminds
one of no other thing but war! The police and other allied internal security
apparatus are responsible for internal security whilst the Armed Forces (Army,
Navy and Airforce) are responsible for the nation’s external security. While
within the Nation’s borders, the place of the Armed Forces is at their
respective barracks else a national emergency.
The current internal security situation in Nigeria calls for
concern and proactive measures to tackle. All this while, the Nigerian
government has been apparently reactive in tackling security issues. In
tackling Nigeria’s internal security issues, the Police force must be
repositioned instead of constantly involving the Armed Forces.
SUGGESTIONS
Tackling the Security issues from the proactive angle calls
for a massive use of intelligence not incessant roadblocks! A coordinated
cooperation among Nigeria’s Intelligence apparatus; the CID (Criminal
Investigation Department), the SSS (State Security Service) and that of the
Armed Forces (the DMI-Director of Military Intelligence) is required. This
brings to question the issue of a National database which has not been tangibly pursued by the government for some time. This will help keep track of every
citizen of the Nigerian State.
Another Proactive measure which the government must consider
is arms control. It is common knowledge that the country is illegally awash
with sophisticated weaponry or how else will one explain the arms with the Boko
Haram militants (who initially started their insurgency with machetes), the
Niger Delta militants and several armed terror unleashing gangs around the
country? Implementing a stiff border control and small arms licensing is the
key to curtailing the trend. One must not also forget that some of these armed
gangs are armed by politicians during elections. In this case, nobody must be
above the law.
Whilst the issue of State police is debateable among Nigerian
circles, Community Policing should not be ignored. Instead of ragtag vigilante groups
patrolling the neighbourhoods, a case of community policing will help bridge
the security gap within neighbourhoods. This also involves the use of local
intelligence and CCTV monitoring instead of roadblocks. As such, Community
Policing can come under a command of an effective local government structure
and help provide security cover in the deep hinterland and curb the excesses of
Herdsmen.
In all, the reactive measures put in place by the government
in quelling the Boko Haram insurgency is quite plausible. However, one cannot
but wink at the re-insurgency of the Boko Haram gangs highlighted in targeted
killings of local vigilante groups even after the Armed forces have claimed to
have swept out the insurgency. A candid implementation of community policing
measures will help abate the trend.
In conclusion, the question ‘quis custodiet
ipsos custodes?’ …who guards the guards must be answered by
the Nigerian Security apparatus. It is embarrassing when the Nigerian internal
security situation degenerates to that of failed states and above all, it is
most embarrassing when Military barracks, police stations, prisons, police headquarters
are attacked with impunity. It does leave one pondering the question ‘quis custodiet ipsos custodes?’ …who
guards the guards? There surely must be an answer to this!